RPLCReplacement Studio
Operator-led studio for SaaS replacement

Replace the SaaS you rent.
Own what you run.

We are a studio. We audit your SaaS stack, ship proprietary software your company owns, and get paid from the real savings we generate. No seat pricing. No vendor lock-in. No dashboards you did not ask for.

Book a 30-minute audit See the BRChina case
Fee tied to real, measured savings Source code delivered to your team Engagements from 4 to 12 weeks
The problem

You are renting tools that a small team could have built.

A 100-person company spends on average the price of a small engineering team each year across 150+ SaaS subscriptions. Half of them overlap. A quarter of them are used by fewer than five people. Many of them do one workflow your team could own outright.

Nobody has the time to audit it. Nobody has the engineering bandwidth to replace it. Procurement keeps renewing. That is the gap RPLC closes.

150+
Active SaaS subscriptions in the average mid-market stack
40%
Licences unused or duplicated
11x
Cost of rented vs owned on a 3-year horizon
0
Internal teams with time to fix it themselves
How it works

One engagement. Three phases. Source code in your name.

01 — Audit

Stack audit

Two weeks. We connect to your billing, SSO and procurement systems, map every seat, overlap and dead subscription, and return a savings report ranked by effort to capture.

02 — Build

Replacement build

Four to eight weeks. We pick the highest-ROI workflow in the audit and build you a focused in-house replacement. Self-hosted. Your domain. Your data. Your repository.

03 — Operate

Operate and expand

Ongoing. We monitor, patch and harden what we built — optional — or hand it over clean. Next quarter, we go after the second line of the audit.

How we get paid

If you don't save money, we didn't work.

Our fee is anchored on the real savings we generate after a replacement goes live. We measure against specific contracts you cancel or downgrade — agreed in writing before the build begins. No modelled savings. No theoretical ROI.

Numbers are discussed once we see your stack and agree on the workflow being replaced. You keep the code, the infrastructure, and everything we built — forever.

"We paid back the engagement in 11 weeks. Then it kept paying."— Content operations lead, 40-person company
Case — BRChina

Replacing the content stack of a media operation.

The situation. A Brazilian media operation running a patchwork of design, scheduling, editing, transcription and AI-writing tools — 47 seats, paid monthly, with constant duplicated work and no ownership of the assets being produced.

What we did. Built an internal content operations platform end-to-end. Scripts, renders, captions, short-form and scheduling, consolidated into a single tool, self-hosted on the company's own infrastructure and owned outright.

The outcome. Five tools cancelled. Output per editor doubled inside the first month. The team owns the codebase and has been extending it independently since.

5
SaaS tools cancelled
2x
Output per editor, month one
11w
Time to full payback
100%
Code and data owned in-house
Same playbook, different starting points

Four sectors. How the first engagement plays out.

Every stack looks different on paper. In practice, the audit surfaces the same kind of overlap. These are the four patterns we encounter most.

01

Media & content operations

40 – 300 employees · content-led · ≥ 20 creators
Day 0
Stack is split across design, scheduling, editing, transcription and generative AI tools. Seats scale faster than output.
Week 2
Audit surfaces four overlapping subscriptions and one workflow worth rebuilding end-to-end.
Week 10
Internal content platform live. First cancellation letters go out.
Month 6
Output per editor doubled. Vendor spend on the workflow cut by more than half. Codebase owned in-house.
02

B2B SaaS & tech-enabled

100 – 800 FTE · Series B–D · Rev-ops heavy
Day 0
CRM, sales intelligence, sequencing, call recording, knowledge base and ticketing — six vendors, three departments, overlapping data.
Week 2
Audit shows two systems of record for the same pipeline and a sequencing tool priced against a number nobody reviews.
Week 8
Lean internal sales-ops layer in production, reading directly from your data warehouse.
Month 6
Two renewals dropped. One consolidated tool owned internally. Go-to-market reporting on your terms.
03

E-commerce & D2C

50 – 250 FTE · Shopify-led · multi-channel
Day 0
Separate vendors for email, SMS, reviews, support, loyalty and subscription. Each billed on contact volume, all growing with the brand.
Week 2
Audit reveals 3 vendors indexed on list size, one renewal priced against a number the team has never verified.
Week 10
Unified customer-comms layer live under your own domain — reviews, support and lifecycle in one codebase.
Month 6
Variable SaaS spend decoupled from contact growth. Customer data stays inside the company.
04

Professional services

Law · accounting · consulting · 30 – 500 FTE
Day 0
Project management, time tracking, document review, client portals, e-sign, billing — eight vendors held together by a spreadsheet.
Week 2
Audit identifies the client-portal + time + billing loop as the single heaviest workflow, priced per-seat across three vendors.
Week 12
Internal practice-management tool live. Partners, associates and clients in one place, branded, confidential, on your servers.
Month 6
Per-seat bills off the books. Confidential documents stop leaving your perimeter.

Not on this list? The playbook is the same: find the workflow that pays for itself, build the replacement, hand it over.

Proof — software we already run ourselves

Proprietary products we built, operate and use every day.

Before we build for clients, we build for ourselves. These are the internal systems we own outright and run daily. They replaced the rented versions first.

BRX Studio

Internal content operations platform

End-to-end content operations for a real media team. Scripting, rendering, captioning, short-form and scheduling — one platform, self-hosted, owned by the company that uses it. Operating in BRChina production.

In production

PresentShare

Deck hosting on your own domain

Authoring and hosting for business decks under your own URL. Password-protected by default, analytics built in, zero-knowledge storage. We publish every deck we send through it.

pp0.gogrowth.me
Who this is for

You know this is for you if —

  • — You have 40 to 400 employees and a real SaaS bill.
  • — You renew contracts you are not sure you still use.
  • — You have a small technical team that is drowning in tickets.
  • — You believe software you own beats software you rent, long-term.
  • — You want one accountable operator, not a retainer agency.
Questions

What people ask before signing.

Are you an agency?

No. We are a studio. We do one thing — audit, build and hand over internal tools that replace a rented SaaS. No retainers by default, no time-and-materials, no slide-ware.

Who owns the code?

You do. Every engagement ends with a full handover: source repository transferred to your organisation, infrastructure under your accounts, deploy credentials delivered.

What if the replacement breaks?

Three options: your team maintains it, we maintain it through the Operate engagement, or we introduce a contracted operator in our network. Most clients keep us operating the first 6 months, then internalise.

How do you calculate the savings?

Before the build we agree in writing which contracts will be cancelled or downgraded once the replacement is live. Savings are measured against those specific line items, based on real invoices. No modelled or theoretical numbers.

How much does it cost?

We don't publish numbers because the shape of the engagement depends on your stack. The audit is a flat fee. The build is quoted after the audit, with a fixed floor for delivery and a success fee tied to the real savings we generate. You see all numbers before anything is signed.

Do you work outside Brazil?

Yes. The team is bilingual, engagements outside Brazil are delivered in English by default, billing happens in USD. Active clients in Brazil, prospects in the US, UK and Portugal.

Why should we trust you over a larger firm?

A larger firm has to keep you on a retainer to stay profitable. We are incentivised the opposite way — to finish fast, leave the code with you, and move on. The fee tied to savings is there to enforce it.

30-minute audit

Tell us about your stack. We will tell you what is replaceable.

Fill in the form. We reply within one business day with a first-pass assessment and, if there is a fit, a time on the calendar. No sales pipeline, no nurture sequence.